I think it's a great opportunity to carve out a new market share without losing any of your current users. I don't love Shapr3D because it use a modeling approach like Solidworks and similar and I, as thousand of people, prefers software like MoI and Rhino. You can also think that I'm just a nuisance and if I care about ARM I can use Shapr3D. Furthermore Qualcomm said that for the end of 2023 they will be ready to ship to OEM the new architecture of CPU that can challenge M2 and/or M3 soc. So the technology is sufficiently mature for ARM software on Windows do a Windows ARM version it is a good service for your customers -> An act of love towards your customers. Now the level of performance in Windows ARM PCs is the same of M1 CPU. You spended time for compile MoI for M1 CPU that was imposed by Apple to all new MAC products: this wasn't a decision in freedom. For every platform it use a subscription plan distributed by "platform stores". But, having tried MoI a few years ago, I find that it has an interface more suited to a "touch and pen" device.Ī great work in this way was made by Shapr3D that start with iPad and moved on Mac, Android ad Windows, so this software born native for ARM architecture and for touch devices. In this way a fairly performing product becomes only sufficient.ĭo not think that I am here to cry because I made a wrong purchase, indeed I am very happy with my Pro X, as you can see I use Rhino quietly.
Currently I can use all 圆4 programs for windows on my Surface Pro X, however having to run them in emulation I lose in performance and battery life.
I think there is a lot of prejudice about this type of devices, just read around the web many folks believe that windows arm devices are at the level of Intel Atom. In Italy we say "It's like the dog biting its own tail":
0 kommentar(er)
